Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anthony Domestico's avatar

Another fantastic set of observations. Thank you!

I love how you can trace the trajectory of "The Fish"--and its movement towards identification, as you put it--through the set of verbs used: "I caught" (there's real distance here: the fish is an object to be acted upon, or a sign of the speaker's victory)--> "I thought" (the speaker moves from noticing the exterior details to imagining the interior details; the verbs rhyme and what a distance we've traveled from the one to the other!)--> "I looked" (the preposition "into" rather than "at" signals that the speaker is now trying to establish some intimacy with the fish, even if the fish/Nature doesn't fully oblige)--> "I admired" --> "I stared and stared" --> "I let the fish go."

This poem, and "Filling Station," are such remarkable examples of Bishop's ethics of perception: looking, when dilated, might lead to caring.

"The whole poem is deliberately, urgently off kilter": a perfect description of this and other Bishop poems.

Expand full comment
Mary Jo Kietzman's avatar

Reading these three poems together, what struck me was the way Bishop seems to be trying to put war, aggression, betrayal into larger contexts that leave room for new endings. The key line in "Roosters" for me is "Old holy sculpture / could set it all together / in one small scene, past and future": two men (Christ and Peter) amazed and surprised, but in between them is the "little cock." Shakespeare describes the rooster as, "the bird of dawning [that] singeth all night long" (during the month "our savior's birth is celebrated"). Could Bishop be thinking of the rooster as a voice from the borderland between night and day, accusation and forgiveness? "Gallus canit; flet Petrus" is Englished as "rooster sings; Peter cries," and Bishop presents Peter's tears as more powerful than the bird's repeated assertions: they "run down our chanticleer's sides and gem his spurs." Feeling (Peter's and the poet's?) make the medieval relic "a tear-encrusted artifact." The holy sculpture like the nativity illustration in "2,000 Illustrations" helps Bishop see the potency of tears and helps her pivot to hope that "deny deny deny"/ is not all the roosters cry. Lovely that the poet's own articulation of the way a new day comes to gild the undersides of things, to make a preamble "like wandering lines in marble" is what resolves the tension of binary endings. "The sun climbs in, following "to see the end," faithful as enemy, or friend." Hope lives when their is no clear ending that can be stated with certainty. This same attempt at wholeness of vision is present in "Little Exercise" and "The Fish" I think. Someone in a boat slept through the storm; and it is the fisherwoman's ability to let go that creates the double victory of the rainbow, which stands for a covenant between poet and the other creatures in the world.

Expand full comment
43 more comments...

No posts