George Inness, Afterglow (1893), detail. Edward B. Butler Collection, Art Institute of Chicago. Willa Cather noted her appreciation of the light in this painting in a review of the Art Institute
When Book Five opens, twenty years have passed, the archetypal time lapse of Rip Van Winkle, one of the plays from Jim and Lena’s theater-going days. We are now in epilogue land. Jim is still firmly committed to backward glances. “Some memories are realities,” he says in the first paragraph of Book Five, “and are better than anything that can ever happen to one again.” I love what Ántonia, firmly in the present, says when she first recognizes Jim: “What’s happened? Is anybody dead?”
We are reminded again and again in these final chapters that Ántonia is surrounded by her children, almost submerged by them, so many children that everyone has lost count. Tiny Soderball thinks Ántonia has “ten or eleven.” I counted twelve, including Martha, her daughter with Larry Donovan. The children, Czech speakers before they go to school, are very close. They adore each other. “I didn’t even know Martha wasn’t my full sister until after she was engaged to Joe,” Anna tells Jim.
When Jim tells Ántonia he has no children, she seems “embarrassed,” as though he has confessed to something shameful. This is a gulf yawning between them. We may wonder whether Ántonia lives in the past as much as Jim does. Do parents generally think that their memories are “better than anything” that can ever happen to them again? Jim lives in the past. Ántonia lives in her children, and the future.
Jim tries to bridge the gulf with intense talk of “the miracle” (what exactly is it?) when he first sees her, almost toothless “but not diminished.” She is, he tells himself, “a rich mine of life, like the founders of early races.” I’ve mentioned before how Cather loves the word “something,” and so does Jim. “She was a battered woman now, not a lovely girl,” he remarks, “but she still had that something which fires the imagination.”
Can we imagine Ántonia herself telling the story of Jim’s visit twenty years after her jilting by Larry Donovan? Would she think, for a minute, that this is the guy she should have married? Would Jim, for all his talk to her sons about how he was “very much in love” with their mother, have consented to stay in Nebraska? Would she have agreed to follow him to New York? Can we imagine her as a city lawyer’s wife, coaxing reluctant Jim to have a couple of kids?
By my count, there are three Antons in the novel and one Ántonia. (Was there a shortage of Bohemian names?) Twelve-year-old Leo gets the most attention in these final chapters, though. Leo with his fiddle—his grandfather’s fiddle—and his faun-like demeanor seems like some apparition from the old country, a wood-sprite, with his “jealous, animal little love.”
And then there’s Anton Cuzak. Tiny Soderball had told Jim that Ántonia hadn’t “done very well,” and that “her husband was not a man of much force.” Lena disagreed, assuring Jim that “there’s nothing the matter with Cuzak. You’d like him. He isn’t a hustler, but a rough man would never have suited Tony.”
Anton doesn’t seem such a bad match for Ántonia, does he? He knows things, like how to graft fruit trees. He’s not a clod. He’s not abusive. He’s kind. He treasures his children and loves his wife. He likes music and dancing. He’s lonely for the city life, but hey, he can dance with the girls on a Saturday night and his wife doesn’t mind. Jim worries that Cuzak has sacrificed too much, that he’s an “instrument of Ántonia’s special mission.”
Jim is a marriage skeptic. “I wondered whether the life that was right for one was ever right for two!” he concludes darkly, as though the single life—or his own independent life within an unhappy marriage—is the “right” one. And yet, he seems bent on adopting himself into Ántonia’s boisterously happy family, sleeping in the hayloft with Leo—“I found I hated to leave this boy”—and planning a hunting trip with the older brothers. “There were enough Cuzaks to play with for a long while yet.”
Cather’s endings always surprise me. It’s as though she knows what we expect: a neat tidying up, a resolution. Instead, we generally get a certain raggedness, a change of direction, a lingering ambiguity or uncertainty. I still don’t know what really happens at the end of one of Cather’s finest stories, “Coming, Aphrodite!” or her (perhaps) greatest novel, The Professor’s House. As for My Ántonia, I sometimes have a hard time holding the ending firmly in mind. All those children. All those Antons. All those photographs.
Book Five does have some surprises, though. Did we expect that the Cutters would turn up in an even more lurid way than when last seen, when Cutter was scheming to rape Ántonia and ended up in bed with Jim instead? A murder-suicide, in Black Hawk? When Rudolph, the oldest boy, tells the story, the other kids are thrilled. “‘Hurrah! The murder!’ the children murmured, looking pleased and interested.” (Remember how much Jim and Ántonia, as children, loved hearing about the man who threw the bride to the wolves?) Five paragraphs from the end of the novel, Jim is still discussing the Cutter case with one of the old local lawyers.
But the final paragraph of the book is grand, almost orchestral, sounding so many of the dominant themes of the novel. It is a very neat tidying up, at least emotionally, at least for Jim. He finds himself on the remains of the very road that first brought him and Ántonia—two “wondering children, being taken we knew not whither”—to Nebraska. “Now I understood that the same road was to bring us together again. Whatever we had missed, we possessed together the precious, the incommunicable past.”
Ah, Jim. Always the dreamer. To quote an even more famous closing sentence: “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”
❧
Please join us in the comments! And then, in real(er) life, in conversation next Sunday at 2 PM (EST) with Chris and Ben Taylor, author of the recent biography, Chasing Bright Medusas: A Life of Willa Cather. Register here. Think about your questions for them!
Chris Benfey is the author of five books about the American Gilded Age, including The Great Wave and A Summer of Hummingbirds, and the family memoir Red Brick, Black Mountain, White Clay. He has written for Book Post on hunting, kites, Whitman, and other subjects.
Book Post is a by-subscription book review service, bringing snack-sized book reviews by distinguished and engaging writers direct to our paying subscribers’ in-boxes. We endeavor to create a shared reading life in a divided world.
Recently in Book Post: Yasmine El Rashidi on Ghaith Abdul-Ahad’s harrowing record of the Iraq war; James Ledbetter on the rambunctious past and possible future of The Village Voice; Andrew Delbanco on a rediscovered gem of the Jazz Age. A paid subscription brings you our joyfully collected book reviews and helps to support our work.
Square Books in Oxford, Mississippi, is Book Post’s Winter 2023 partner bookstore! We partner with independent bookstores to link to their books, support their work, and bring you news of local book life across the land. We’ll send a free three-month subscription to any reader who spends more than $100 with our partner bookstore during our partnership. Send your receipt to info@bookpostusa.com. Read more about Square here in Book Post.
Follow us: Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Notes, Bluesky, Threads @bookpostusa
If you liked this piece, please share and tell the author with a “like.”
Not ready for a paid subscription to Book Post? Show your appreciation with a tip
Chris, thank you for another set of interesting and helpful reflections. I had a number of thoughts as I finished the novel, none very articulate, but most of them circling in one way or another around a theme you have highlighted here: the tension between living in the future (or even simply the present?) and living in the past. (I am not certain, however, that Antonia lives in the future--in some respects, she may also live in the past, though your comments about all her children are very well taken. But maybe that's for a different comment.)
The word that kept coming to me to describe the mood of the story was "bittersweet." I constantly had the feeling that I was being offered glimpses of a lasting happiness that was always just out of reach--certainly for Jim, but also for the reader. (For Antonia as well? I'm not really sure. Her joy and good spirits are memorable and infectious. But her life has been difficult.) If Book Five's images of Antonia and her family provide a happy ending of sorts--as I think they do--it is an ending that we observe along with Jim but don't exactly share, and perhaps couldn't.
The whole time I was reading, I had this nagging sense that I was being reminded of some famous line, maybe something from a poem, or a familiar work of literature, something I ought to remember but couldn't. Then suddenly, near the end, it came to me: "Werd' ich zum Augenblicke sagen: / Verweile doch! du bist so schön! ..." Without any attempt at poetry: "If ever I should say to the present moment: Tarry a while, you are so beautiful! ..." That certainly seems to capture Jim's attitude, always trying to freeze a moment and hang onto it, something the closing sentence seems to suggest (perhaps misleadingly) that he and Antonia have succeeded in doing. It can't be done, of course. Along with that wonderful last paragraph, I also love the penultimate one, with its description of the old road that has almost disappeared, the one along which Jim and Antonia had first come out west to Black Hawk. It is not completely gone--Jim can still see its traces (though his description of them, "like gashes torn by a grizzly's claws," is hardly idealized). But those traces are a far cry from the original road. Similarly, that original journey has left its traces on Jim and Antonia--he even claims (also perhaps misleadingly) that "early accidents of fortune... predetermin[e] for us all that we can ever be." But they have changed since then. (Chris, you don't happen to know whether Cather had any special fondness for Goethe, or for Faust? I wouldn't want to push the comparison very far--it doesn't really work, I don't think--but there is even an element of the Gretchen story about Antonia.)
In the same way, there is something Edenic about the many beautiful descriptions of the natural world throughout the book. This time I was particularly struck by a paragraph in ch. 1 of Bk. 5, when Jim and Antonia are in the orchard, watching her children: "The hedges were so tall that we could see nothing but the blue sky above them.... The afternoon poured down on us through the drying grape leaves. The orchard seemed full of sun, like a cup, and we could smell the ripe apples on the trees." A garden, and even one with apple trees! But if Jim and Antonia sometimes seem to inhabit an Eden in the beautiful prairie countryside, it is one that from the very beginning had a snake in it. The idyll remains just out of reach. Jim wants to fix it between the covers of a book for us, but his idealized past remains, as the very last word reminds us, "incommunicable."
I wouldn't want to leave it simply with that, although I have already let this comment go on far too long. There is also a more positive side to all of this, even if, for me, that bittersweet flavor predominates. We cannot hang onto the past, cannot say to any present moment, "Tarry a while." But we do carry traces of the past forward with us. The Old World immigrants bring aspects of their culture with them. Lena and Tiny leave Black Hawk but build lives for themselves that draw upon their experiences there. Antonia does not regret her time in town but is grateful for the lessons she learned and can now put to use on the farm. Her husband Anton similarly draws upon his previous experiences. Even Jim has renewed his friendship with Antonia and her family and will, it appears, remain in contact with this aspect of his past. I am not as widely read in Cather's work as I should be--and am grateful for the prompt by Ann and Chris to return to her here!--but I think the question of what we take from the past and how we build upon it in the present is one of her deepest themes.
While I'm at it, let me toss in one more comment, which I promise will be much shorter: what do people think of that possessive pronoun in the book's title? When Jim hands over his manuscript, he writes "Antonia" on its cover. But he "frowned" at that, and then added another word, making the title, "My Antonia." The frame narrator says, "That seemed to satisfy him."
Is this just a matter of perspective? The story we are getting is Jim's version of Antonia, and if someone else told her story, it would be different? Although it appears, at least on the evidence we have, that people remember her in similar ways. Is the possessive aspect of "my" more significant? Is this another instance of Jim trying to freeze a moment and hang onto it for himself? I'm not really sure, but Cather goes out of her way to point out that he adds the "my."